Search results

IF the Jan window was anything to go by I doubt that many clubs have many to spend. It could be a very quiet summer.

There is no substitute for natural ability.

Whereas the money coming from as the figure must now be around the £150m mark? Even if it was ring fenced that’s still another £50m needed.

I understand all of that but it still doesn’t detract from the fact that it is hideous.

top ten finish my arse.

Like your friends …. Imaginary?

The only reason he started was because you didn’t have anyone else, not because of some clever plan. Saying that all the power to him.

Sounds about right. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

That went well. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The truth sits somewhere between the two views. good players yes but brilliant … I think not. Oh and using being picked by Southgate to play for England as some sort of approval of brilliance is quite frankly bollocks. I give you Maguire, Mings et al … Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

100M …… I think not. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Takeaways? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

the stadium,training facilities et al were part of the 400M, not in addition to. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Hmmm someone appears not to understand the meaning of squandered. We have not wasted £300M as it was invested in: 1. New stadium with subsequent upgrades 2. New training facility for first team, womens and academy players 3. Investing heavily in 1st team, womens and academy teams On the...

True injuries etc. The other problem is how you keep those not playing in the World Cup match fit. What odds that they’ll be a few ‘behind closed door friendlies’? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I would like to think so. When you look at benches last season many teams only had three or four players at most that could make a difference, the rest were window dressing. The additions to our squad will mean we have at least 5 players on the bench who can make a difference, even with injuries...

Or clubs who have invested heavily in the squad …. West Ham and one Brighton and Hove Albion spring to mind ….. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

True but moving to 5 subs changes the dynamics of the 25 man squad. With 3 subs you could get by with 18/19, 5 subs means you need 21/22. You need at least another 4 Eze’s and Olise just to hang on. Loosing zaha without a similar replacement is going to hurt, as is not having a replacement for...

Thriving academy … really? Your POTS will be heading back to Chelsea. New owners that looked a jumping ship to Chelsea? You sound very bitter … Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

They remind me of Huddersfield in their first prem season. Loads of press, diving in and generally running around like lunatics. Unfortunately very fragile at the back and you can’t play like that for 90 minutes nor a whole season. Wonderful!!! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk