Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
Resigned as a Conservative MP.What's he done?
Resigned as a Conservative MP.What's he done?
And people ask that if Labour don't publish, today, a plethora of policies in a manifesto that will instantly, clearly and indisputably reverse the national decline caused by the tories, then why vote for them?Utter corruption
Getting passed on Monday.
Sunak's family firm signed a billion-dollar deal with BP before PM opened new North Sea licences
The CEO of one of Infosys' other major clients, Shell, also joined Rishi Sunak's new business council two weeks ago.www.thelondoneconomic.com
And people can't work out why someone with such obscene family death wants to be PM.
Utter corruption
Getting passed on Monday.
Sunak's family firm signed a billion-dollar deal with BP before PM opened new North Sea licences
The CEO of one of Infosys' other major clients, Shell, also joined Rishi Sunak's new business council two weeks ago.www.thelondoneconomic.com
And people can't work out why someone with such obscene family death wants to be PM.
Fair play.
An Tory MP with integrity.
An Tory MP with integrity.
I'm sure he willFujitsu appoints Michael Keegan as head of UK and Ireland - Business & Finance
Fujitsu today announced it has appointed Michael Keegan as head of its £1.8bn business in the UK and Ireland. Keegan’s new role sees him take the reins from Duncan Tait, who was recently promoted to head of EMEIA, corporate senior vice president, Fujitsu Ltd. Keegan has worked at Fujitsu for a...businessandfinance.com
Keegan’s experience in the IT sector includes holding senior leadership roles at the Royal Mail Group/Post Office Ltd,"
Seems he had a very important crossover role The Tories have kept this quiet . Surely he must have something relevant to say
Personally, I want Labour to publish because I want to be inspired to vote Labour by well thought out policies that will make a real difference. I will vote for them regardless in order to have a government that (hopefully) will not be corrupt, dishonest and completely devoid of ability. So they have my vote, but I do not believe they have a clue as to what they are going to do to make a difference, apart from integrity. As I have said before, that is enough , but then if they wont admit to not having workable policy then they are not being honest even before they become a government.And people ask that if Labour don't publish, today, a plethora of policies in a manifesto that will instantly, clearly and indisputably reverse the national decline caused by the tories, then why vote for them?
As if this justifies allowing a bunch of venal ****s to carry on gorging on public resources, redirecting public money into their own bank accounts. Even voting for it. Sake.
I'm not sure that they won't admit to not having a workable policy. I would imagine they think they do have a workable policy. But policy is very different from strategy, tactics and plan. A lot of that will need months to roll out. It's a bit like football management. Birmingham changed their policy when they brought in Rooney. Get rid of the anonymous plodder and replace him with England's second greatest goal scorer. There was no thought to strategy tactics or plan. Brighton didn't change policy when we brought in RDZ. Another bright young manager untested in UK football, who had achieved above expectation with unfashionable clubs. Our strategy didn't change a great deal either (in terms of spending on players - albeit it may have done so and we don't know about it because it is secret) but our tactics did. A different way of playing, and a different type of man management and training. I see good politics being like how Brighton is run. And that does not mean explaining in advance how every team selection over the next 5 years will achieve a win, or having to apologize and resign whenever we lose. And we put our trust in Bloom without his explaining the strategy tactics or plan. For the moment I'm content to cut Starmer some of the slack I cut Dick Knight when he took over from Archer. Whether the country is a f***ed as we were when we lost the Goldstone is a matter that only history will be able to determine.Personally, I want Labour to publish because I want to be inspired to vote Labour by well thought out policies that will make a real difference. I will vote for them regardless in order to have a government that (hopefully) will not be corrupt, dishonest and completely devoid of ability. So they have my vote, but I do not believe they have a clue as to what they are going to do to make a difference, apart from integrity. As I have said before, that is enough , but then if they wont admit to not having workable policy then they are not being honest even before they become a government.
Moved across from the Post OfficeDuring some of the Horizon/Post Office shenanigans, guess who was CEO of Fujitsu.
Why, it was Secretary of State for Education, Gillian Keegan’s husband Michael Keegan.
I worry that this country is in worse state than the Albion under ArcherI'm not sure that they won't admit to not having a workable policy. I would imagine they think they do have a workable policy. But policy is very different from strategy, tactics and plan. A lot of that will need months to roll out. It's a bit like football management. Birmingham changed their policy when they brought in Rooney. Get rid of the anonymous plodder and replace him with England's second greatest goal scorer. There was no thought to strategy tactics or plan. Brighton didn't change policy when we brought in RDZ. Another bright young manager untested in UK football, who had achieved above expectation with unfashionable clubs. Our strategy didn't change a great deal either (in terms of spending on players - albeit it may have done so and we don't know about it because it is secret) but our tactics did. A different way of playing, and a different type of man management and training. I see good politics being like how Brighton is run. And that does not mean explaining in advance how every team selection over the next 5 years will achieve a win, or having to apologize and resign whenever we lose. And we put our trust in Bloom without his explaining the strategy tactics or plan. For the moment I'm content to cut Starmer some of the slack I cut Dick Knight when he took over from Archer. Whether the country is a f***ed as we were when we lost the Goldstone is a matter that only history will be able to determine.
Well....I was going to tweak my post in that direction, but decided to be less hyperbolic. We don't yet have to rent part of Belgium and move the population there for two years while we find an uninhabited island to build a new societyMoved across from the Post Office
I worry that this country is in worse state than the Albion under Archer
At least under Dick Knight there was hope of some sort of recovery with the full support of everyone behind him.
Despite everything that has happened and how bad it has become, Starmer will not get full support as he tries to turn around a generational downward shift in our fortunes.
well, they would only try filling it with champagne whilst leaving the plug out …. still who cares eh?We are an absolute shambles. Don’t give the Eton boys the key to the country ever again. They couldn’t run a bath by themselves.