Thunder Bolt
Silly old bat
It's begun.
Shameful
It's begun.
"illegal immigration" is, sadly, all the Conservatives have left.Shameful
It's going to be a toxic build up to the general election....Shameful
In their quest to turn the whole nation into gammon."illegal immigration" is, sadly, all the Conservatives have left.
Sadly a lot of Tory voters will believe that this is true, such is their gullibility or mendacity, and visceral hatred of Labour.Shameful
Yes but what are labour going to do about it?The concept was a lie. We were told asylum was to be processed in Rwanda when it was no such thing. A one way ticket to a country with a dubious human rights record.
The Tories' tactic for the next year or so will not be to defend their record (because it is indefensible except to the most blinkered Gammons or Daily Mail readers), but to spread lies, misinformation and scare-stories about what a Labour government will do.(If I ever here someone actually say that I may have to be 'held back')
Rwanda is/was never going to work unless the Tories included restoring legal routes to claim asylum in the UK *and* having a working agreement with France to intercept and return boats to France. You can't try to copy the Australian system if you don't also learn from the mistakes Australia made while trying to get their system working.I can't really help you in the former either, but it's frustrating because it should have been able to work. Of course the Tories are going way too far now trying to force it through by smashing international law, but the overall concept made sense.
If only it was the ‘gammon’. Mainstream tv uses the phrase regularly so it is now in the national pschye, like a catchphrase.In their quest to turn the whole nation into gammon.
The best thing that Labour can do about it, is get the popcorn out. There's no need to do anything else.Yes but what are labour going to do about it?
(If I ever here someone actually say that I may have to be 'held back')
Besides all the money going to Rwanda (and people want to stop Foreign Aid?), millions have been wasted on legal fees.A couple of articles, the first from the BBC, that may help with the legal arguments:
Can the new Rwanda bill work and what could stop it?
The legislation could set up a politically explosive fight with the courts.www.bbc.co.uk
'An astounding level of hypocrisy'
'The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications'
The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill has been published with much fanfare, following the conclusion a treaty between the UK and Rwanda that provides for some asylum-seekers to be remo…publiclawforeveryone.com
This is a tough read, so go down to the very last sentence.
'....the Rwanda Bill, and the policy to which it seeks to give effect, is ultimately a smoke-and-mirrors exercise that promises something which, as a matter of legal fact, it simply cannot deliver.'
I made the mistake of discussing politics with the person who does some cleaning for me, last week. I commented on the draconian regulations that are making my nice Chinese and Indian 'overseas' students (who pay annual fees of £15,000 plus) apply for visas every year. Because the marks come out late, they can't have their application assessed till it is clear they have progressed. So they are having to leave the country, reapply for a visa, and then find it isn't granted till after the start of the next term. They then return late, sometimes with nowhere to live, and some are getting stressed and depressed, needing counselling and extensions for the ongoing deadlines. And making huge amounts of extra work for staff like me who have to create new assessments and spend time managing individual cases. I can see them voting with their feet when this all becomes common knowledge back home.If only it was the ‘gammon’. Mainstream tv uses the phrase regularly so it is now in the national pschye, like a catchphrase.
How do Labour or anyone else convince the nation that it is legal to claim asylum?
The tories know this, which is why Sue Ellen and her gang want us to rip up all our commitments to international law, and join Russia and North Korea as pariah nations, governing by decree.A couple of articles, the first from the BBC, that may help with the legal arguments:
Can the new Rwanda bill work and what could stop it?
The legislation could set up a politically explosive fight with the courts.www.bbc.co.uk
'An astounding level of hypocrisy'
'The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications'
The Rwanda Bill and its constitutional implications
The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill has been published with much fanfare, following the conclusion a treaty between the UK and Rwanda that provides for some asylum-seekers to be remo…publiclawforeveryone.com
This is a tough read, so go down to the very last sentence.
'....the Rwanda Bill, and the policy to which it seeks to give effect, is ultimately a smoke-and-mirrors exercise that promises something which, as a matter of legal fact, it simply cannot deliver.'
Absolutely.Besides all the money going to Rwanda (and people want to stop Foreign Aid?), millions have been wasted on legal fees.
All taxpayers money.
I know only too well, unfortunately. We had a Chinese student living with us for three years, and my son’s ex did the marketing for Manchester, and then Nottingham Uni.I made the mistake of discussing politics with the person who does some cleaning for me, last week. I commented on the draconian regulations that are making my nice Chinese and Indian 'overseas' students (who pay annual fees of £15,000 plus) apply for visas every year. Because the marks come out late, they can't have their application assessed till it is clear they have progressed. So they are having to leave the country, reapply for a visa, and then find it isn't granted till after the start of the next term. They then return late, sometimes with nowhere to live, and some are getting stressed and depressed, needing counselling and extensions for the ongoing deadlines. And making huge amounts of extra work for staff like me who have to create new assessments and spend time managing individual cases. I can see them voting with their feet when this all becomes common knowledge back home.
So, all my cleaner had to say was "well they all bring their families don't they".
None to my knowledge. And given they are all minted and paying massive fees, so what if they did?
My cleaner appears to have a picture of anyone coming here as some sort of Muslim terrorist with a massive entourage of hungry criminal spongers in tow.
And people wonder why we have a shortage of doctors and nurses. I waited 3 months for surgery a couple of years ago. I need the same op again and am waiting a year now, and have just been told I have to do my pre-assessment again because my original is now out of date.
Still, when they start sending the spongers to Rwanda it will all improve, won't it.
The Tax Payers Alliance, based at Tufton Street. Say no more.Absolutely.
If I could be so inclined, I would keep a real time list of costs, including the time wasted by MPs, researchers, analysts, Parliamentary time, departmental time etc.
And then I would ask The Taxpayers' Alliance, why there isn't anything on their blog about this obscene waste of public money.
Blog
Our blog covers a wide range of topics including tax reform and local government wastewww.taxpayersalliance.com
I suspect she's embarrassed enough by the picture in the first place - she won't want to draw yet further attention to it...It's going to be a toxic build up to the general election....
... I wonder if she can sue for the use of her picture without permission? (Assuming she didn't give permission)