Deportivo Seagull
I should coco
Does she bollocks. She’ll find herself on the naughty step for contempt with all the other pollocks.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Does she bollocks. She’ll find herself on the naughty step for contempt with all the other pollocks.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
only in that its implicit confession, what she was expecting for her support.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
She doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
But does she though? Leaving aside the massive hypocrisy of suggesting there might be 'gongs' in wait for those that do their masters' bidding, 3 of the 4 Tories are already in safe seats and 2 are already knights of the realm. What exactly does she think they are being lined up for?By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Yes, but when she's up against Failing Grayling and, my personal nadir, Gavin Williamson (as Education Secretary, of all things), that's some seriously stiff competition.She doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.
This is the minister who before committees and interviews stated ->
1) Channels Four is in receipt of public money. It's commercially funded.
2) Channel Five was more successful after being privatised. Channel 5 has never been publicly owned.
3) Channel Four used actors (as opposed to real people) in a documentary she appeared in. Subsequent investigations by Channels Four and the production company proved the statement to be incorrect.
None of her statements above are true, not even opinion but she refuses to correct the record.
.. and whilst making a public and immediate resignation from her post, hasn't gone anywhere whilst she argues for her gong back.
She's straight out of the Johnson playbook.
The committee might have voted unanimously but, as chair of the committee, Harriet Harman doesn't have a vote (unless it's in the balance).Did I read that the inquiries outcome was voted on unanimously by the committee? if so the attacks on Harriet Harman are vile, but not unexpected. And as for mad Nad's
Unanimous. Yes.Did I read that the inquiries outcome was voted on unanimously by the committee? if so the attacks on Harriet Harman are vile, but not unexpected. And as for mad Nad's
Isn't that Sir Gavin Williamson?Yes, but when she's up against Failing Grayling and, my personal nadir, Gavin Williamson (as Education Secretary, of all things), that's some seriously stiff competition.
What the actual feck are you taking about?By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
Which is what?By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
As others have said.....you're wrong on this occasion.By no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.
No, she doesn’t. Not one. She’s just trying to smear the committee especially now they’ve been warned that calling it a kangaroo court is contempt of Parliament itself. (Ps she did yesterday)
I think they need to read the room. The tide has turned and whilst it is a small but vocal minority in support, everyone else thinks he’s a ****. Well I think he’s a ****, they most probably think he actually a bad egg.Supporters of Boris Johnson have vowed to target Conservative members of the privileges committee and Tory MPs who endorse its findings for deselection, as the aftermath of the report prompted vicious internal infighting.
One ally of the former prime minister said they expected Bernard Jenkin, the most senior Tory on the committee, which said Johnson misled parliament in denying any lockdown-breaking parties, could be a particular focus in his Harwich and North Essex seat.
Let's not forget Johnson is a man who, while a journalist, 'facilitated' an agreement by which fellow former Bullingdon Club acolyte Darius Guppy and a few thugs would beat up a rival journalistSupporters of Boris Johnson have vowed to target Conservative members of the privileges committee and Tory MPs who endorse its findings for deselection, as the aftermath of the report prompted vicious internal infighting.
One ally of the former prime minister said they expected Bernard Jenkin, the most senior Tory on the committee, which said Johnson misled parliament in denying any lockdown-breaking parties, could be a particular focus in his Harwich and North Essex seat.
And still doesn't know the difference between Rugby League and UnionShe doesn't have a point on anything. One of the worst (if not the worst) member of a front bench in living memory in a very competitive field.
This is the minister who before committees and interviews stated ->
1) Channels Four is in receipt of public money. It's commercially funded.
2) Channel Five was more successful after being privatised. Channel 5 has never been publicly owned.
3) Channel Four used actors (as opposed to real people) in a documentary she appeared in. Subsequent investigations by Channels Four and the production company proved the statement to be incorrect.
None of her statements above are true, not even opinion but she refuses to correct the record.
.. and whilst making a public and immediate resignation from her post, hasn't gone anywhere whilst she argues for her gong back.
She's straight out of the Johnson playbook.
And still hasn't resigned yet.And still doesn't know the difference between Rugby League and Union
Let's not forget Johnson is a man who, while a journalist, 'facilitated' an agreement by which fellow former Bullingdon Club acolyte Darius Guppy and a few thugs would beat up a rival journalist
I doubt it’s sharp enoughBy no means a fan of hers, but she may have a point.