Search results

With the BBC’s track record I’m surprised he’s not already back on the screens? Ease him back gently, maybe a stint on CBeebies or Songs of Praise I shouldn’t wonder.

I remember that joke, Danny Baker did it when he was pulled off air………..

If the rumours are true then this rich man not only watched porn, but spaffed 35k to get his kicks from the images and vids he could procure from a young drug addict online, hardly xhamster is it? A young drug addict currently residing in a hotel, with the wherewithal to appoint a lawyer to act...

A silly old 61 year old fart earning circa 500k of taxpayers money sending 35k to a 17/18 year old who’s parents had complained about his conduct, along by all accounts other young parole he worked with? Maybe if he worked for an institution that didn’t have a track record of employing nonces...

So, PA gets out his particular corner with money, and has no criminal charges answer. PS has no criminal case to answer either, yet we know he got his young squeeze a job on itv and he was living his best life with Phil till the wheels came off. At this point Huw has not denied whether or not...

This assessment is covered by a) i.e. avoidance of the allegations whilst letting your missus speak up on your behalf. If poor old Huw has no case to answer in light of the Sun’s revelations then the best “cure” for that is to address the matters directly and close them down. Till then I will...

If you, as an individual permanently in the public eye, were in a media storm, where your reputation was at risk due to claims in the press that were false; would you a) let your missus front up on your behalf with a narrative that you were finding it a bit difficult to deal with, or b) front up...

Like I say, neither Schofield or Prince Andrew were guilty of crimes but neither have not been able to redeem their reputations. So whilst there are no “victims” per se, there were quite evidently individuals, poorer and less influential than their wealthy “abusers” who were wrapped up in their...

Like I said time will tell, and maybe Huw didn’t approach teenagers online for pics or transfer them thousands of pounds for nothing in particular? Maybe he didn’t break lockdown rules to visit young people in their homes for cups of tea. But then he could very easily dispel the innuendo by...

Is it more appropriate to compare Edwards to Schofield or Prince Andrew? Rich and powerful men who are also able to hide their tracks so to speak? Maybe they are all innocent of a de facto crime; but we all know they were sailing close to the wind at best or abusing their influence at worst...