Search results

i cant fathom the value now, let alone 6mth. nontheless, he has a substantial increase in net worth that can be securitised.

the merger it's done, renames as Trump Media from Monday. no idea how funded but the valuation is there. though his stock would be locked for some time, he might be able to borrow against them. jammy git.

the vast majority of his supporters wouldn't have watched the original speech. they'll first see the headline reactions, then the counter-claims of a "hoax". whether manner said was deliberate or not, the media played along, either a predictable part or creating an issue.

you'd agree that saying there could be a "bloodbath" in US job opportunities with Chinese imports via Mexico*, vs a bloodbath following an election are very different things? dozens of US headlines say the later, which when shown in context will be used as evidence there is campaign against...

hardly an apologist, just a simple observation the reaction to his speech will serve him well. he is manipulating his supporters and detrators at the same time.

may be you've watched the whole thing unedited, sounds to me like the two comments edited together to sound like that.

there's a problem here, he's misquoted about a word and everyone loses their shit over it. the bloobath comment is relating to trade. i know full well he uses the language to trigger a reaction in his supporters. it also works on his opponents. they latch on, cry about it, then his...

as i read it, the basic point of law was he's not been convicted with insurrection (or i gather actually charged with). so amendment doesn't apply. the legal system is rather black and white, without a long list of possible good reasons to stop someone. the bad actor has to be proven to have...

yep, Trump has been spouting nonsense for a lot long and doesn't have senility as an excuse. highlighting Biden isn't fit for office is not an endorsement of Trump. the fact that's even the choice is an appaling failure of both political parties. though Trump does come across have bit more...

let's park the precise age. its pretty clear Biden is not well, getting leaders and countries confused, bearly stringing sentances together.

getting deep into partisan US politics here. its certainly not a simple Trump v Biden issue. as far as i can tell there is constitutional disagreement about power it gives federal government away from states. commentators have said they simply dont need the bill as powers already exist, the...

Trump would have done as he was told by military advisors. some might have pushed for more intervention, earlier supply of some weapon systems.

classifed documents have been found though. as i understand it, after denial then amnesia before documents were found, he resorted to i'm special so the law doesn't apply. then made a claim he declassified them, which is beyond his power. that's his defense, "as President I can do what I...

you seem to ignore some documents are never declassifed and should, under their classification, never have left the whitehouse. his claims are an admission he did what he is accused of, you cant defend that with whataboutery.

true, trouble is voting for Biden doesn't look too clever either.

load of waffle, it's "drain the swamp" rebranded to "end the deep state". he did sweet fa on the matter last time round. part of the reason Trump gets away with it is the American liberals clutching pearls rather than laughing at him. they react in a way that makes the conservatives believe...

pretty sure constitutional changes need 2/3rds majority in both Senate and Congress, then ratification by similar ratio of states. he wont get the support for change.

what would be the point of that, once he's got the nomination?

by storming a building while elected officals go through their procedures, stopping those procedures and attempting to steal documents relating to those procedures. you might not like the term "insurrection", you'd prefer attempted coup. whatever wording, fact is Trump encouraged them to...

cant see it would make much difference, if you want to support another candidate you need to go vote for them. staying in means you're happy to go with the decision of others in the party.