Putin also knows that NATO membership has an entry requirement of not having disputed borders (written in to avoid, for example, Montenegro joining then immediately invoking Article 5 against Serbia). This is why he’s constantly pushing the boundaries against the likes of Georgia and Ukraine...
They likely will, but they'll let Russia and the West wear each other down (assuming they do) before acting, they don't want to provoke a war with the rest themselves
On the US side, I still don’t get why the US military industrial complex isn’t screaming at Congress to let their toys be used by Ukraine, giving it the most robust testing ground they could possibly imagine
Here we go again
NATO is not going to be getting directly involved in Ukraine. It never was and it never will. It will support it (or at least should), but those hoping for / demanding scenarios where NATO troops are shooting at Russians or NATO jets are taking out Russian drones / missiles...
To keep it on track, Iranian drones can’t be used to take out Ukrainian cities if Iran is sending them toward Israel, so in that sense (given Israel will just shoot pretty much all of these down quite comfortably) that’s a positive for Ukraine I guess?
And may I be the first to offer my congratulations to Vladimir Putin on securing a 99.7% vote in favour of Siberia remaining in Russia at next year’s referendum
Given it's pretty clear the US and UK (at least) knew this was coming a good 10 days ago and warned Russia, who seemingly didn't act on it, the more interesting question IMHO is why they seemingly ignored the threat;
A. Arrogance and not wanting to be seen listening to "the west", which has had...
The thing is it wouldn’t surprise me if terrorists did have contacts in Ukraine. These terror organisations likely have contacts in basically every nation on earth. That doesn’t mean it has anything to do with Ukraine.