That’s true, but I’m struggling to rationalise why the defender would be ahead of the attacker, like the attack would have no reason to slow down their run to reach the ball.
I’m absolutely fuming. If there was any justice in the world Coventry would’ve won. How on earth is that in the spirit of the game to disallow a goal because the attack is a finger in front of the last defender, what advantage has he gained at all? VAR is the worst thing to happen to football...