Search results

£19.5 million

https://www.premierleague.com/news/3858986 A Club will be in breach of the PSRs if its PSR Calculation over the relevant period results in a loss in excess of £105 million (with that threshold reduced by £22million for each season that the relevant Club has been in the Championship during the...

That's is as maybe in the case of Forest, I don't know what their FFP financial figures were. I was simply making the point that the P&S rules for promoted clubs favours the established PL clubs. The P&S rule assumes that a promoted club has made a loss of £44m in the two years prior to...

Indeed but seems a little unfair to promoted teams. In the Championship the permitted loss is £39m over a 3 year period, (average of £13m/annum). The PL rules for P&S assume however a newly promoted club has lost £22m a year for each of the first two of a three year period. Considering a...

Sorry if fixtures but haven't seen mentioned the fact that the P&S rules for Forest for the 22/23 period, in terms of allowable losses, is different than that for the teams that had been in the PL for three years.

Make that £38.9m in 2916/17 and £25m in 2015/16

That's precisely why the high revenue clubs have historically shown support for P&S rules. Stops the smaller clubs from threatening their position in the league. I doubt either of the Manchester clubs nor Liverpool, (clubs with 3 x the revenue of Brighton), will be voting for it's removal any...