Search results

I was going to say the same thing. They must be convinced Glasner is the real deal and you have to say, based on their end of season form, they might not be wrong.

Ah yes, the lesser known solution to a burning pile of money - throwing more and more and more money on it.

True. It's a bit like leaving someone you don't like on 'unread' though for me. I'd prefer a nice, hearty "feck off ya chancers"

Oh I've no idea. Just seems odd to me that the Premier League don't have a veto or something for certain potential owners who seem, on the surface, dodgy as f***.

I'm sorry, what? Asked by Damian Collins why the league had not rejected the 777 offer outright, amid uncertainty over the group’s finances and problems at its other clubs, Masters said his scope was limited. He said the league could approve a deal or leave it unapproved but could not reject it...

Whilst not wishing to encourage people to read the Daily Mail... Premier League eyeing ABOLISHING points deductions and introducing an NBA-style 'luxury tax' over fears top stars will leave if rules restrict their pay - after Everton and Nottingham Forest lost points

Yep, I know. I'm not disputing that. I'm just suggesting that should City get away with their charges that Everton may well wonder why.

I just think if City go unpunished for 100+ charges whilst other clubs, rightly, get punished that those punished clubs will be a bit miffed and would probably be wondering why.

Imagine the legal kerfuffle if Everton / Forest / any other club gets punished whilst City don't. Or punished further in Everton's case. Lawsuits up the wazoo