Search results

Yep, agreed. I worked in IT related departments and the only way to change data, other than a prescribed auditable process, was to change the raw data field on the system. This could only be done with a lot of blood letting and management control.

Much is to do with whoever audited the system. It was suggested in the hearing today that it had been audited several times - I find that amazing. Auditors need naming and shaming.

Wasn’t me guv! But I know a few people who should have done their jobs better who I am throwing under a bus.

As a lass would once have reflected, “they would have said that wouldn’t they”.

Be interesting to know just how much liability Horizon have in all this, and whether or not their liability is nil if the Post Office signed it off.

I worked in IT for many years, specifying and system testing fairly major computer systems for a major financial institution. Testing was really rigorous and covered every eventuality and it would never go into production until it had been signed off to death. I suspect that it wasn’t properly...