Search results

and there are a load of idiots on here as well, which I also happen to class myself 😂😂🤪

and I think that/these typifies that politics always completely divides and ends up in playground boo, sucks, yah

Is he/she/them/it standing as an independent?

Sorry to appear so negative on this but surely no matter what format of taxation/redistribution, call it what you will will not ever end up having the impact on the super wealthy that people may crave. With such wealth comes the ability to engage the services of the very best taxation advisors...

good point well presented.

Okay

I conclude you’re incapable of understanding confidentiality.

oh whatever, grow up and understand why Im not going to put out details about specific establishments and their budgetary spends. If you don’t like that tough, you can be as cynical as makes you feel happy with yourself. If you can’t mange to get your head around that never mind.

Its not non answering at all, but I’m not going to post confidential matters on a forum to satisfy you and your snide little comments. Nothing to do with whataboutery at all. I’m just asking you your thoughts on a matter I asked earlier. Its more a case that you only want to answer or make...

there are many. I have had business dealings with private sector over many many years. I won’t name specifics of projects but rest assured there are many cases. But even that aside, i asked the question earlier as to why should they be able to not pay vat on heating and such like but little old...

and so? Why shouldn’t they pay it? If they were that short of money then rein in some of the vanity projects they invest in.

so don’t add it to the fees, but stop them claiming back the vat on what they spend.

surely the better policy would be to ensure both

obviously they can’t reclaim vat on non vat rated goods as they wouldn’t have paid any. I’m more talking about why they shouldn’t be able to claim back vat on rated goods and services as they do currently. Let’s say for example VAT paid on a 20 million drama suite or sports hall etc. Or what...

it’s not spite tax as you say, it’s fairness. Even if you didn’t levy vat on the fees is it right that they don’t pay vat on the services that they employ and engage? Let’s argue for example the millions spent on infrastructure, furnishings etc etc, should they be able to claim back the vat on...

and dare I say the same for doctors and consultants (unless of course there already is and i’m wrong) and so there should be for anyone who’s training costs are bourse by the public purse.

and I likewise deleted my post you have replied to. Sorry.

spending what? It would take far more than dozens of these to outspend the likes of Bton COLLEGE, roedean, Hurst etc etc

deleted my post, probably was a bit out of order

Get what you’re saying, but where do you draw a distinction. Im no expert but I would imagine that the vast majority of private schools expenditure comes via the big guns. Why should they take the proverbial pee just so the rarer examples you put forward get the vat knocked off?