Search results

Ah it’s his plane! Cheers. Sometimes I wonder if knowing absolutely nothing about these things is a blessing or a disguise.

What’s the significance of this tweet?

If Putin (and historically Russia) simply use their nuclear weapons as an idle threat, and people are saying they’d never actually use them (Raab has said similar on the media rounds this morning), then what is the actual risk in escalating things? If a no fly zone was created for instance? If...

Can we realistically be hit though? I’m assuming these things have a certain distance they can travel? And presumably we have some kind of defence in place to (have no idea what I’m talking about) intercept any genuine threat?

Well I’ll take all those responses. Cheers!

Is anyone else worried about Russia appearing to single out the UK above anyone else in terms of him doing something nuts? Is there anything he can actual do?

A fire at the nuclear plant. Great.

Rasputin by Boney M

If this figure of 4500 Russian fatalities is anywhere near true it’s absolutely staggering. IIRC 7000 US soldiers died in Iraq and Afghanistan in the nearly twenty years of those wars.

What are there guys on?

I was always accused of doing an A Level in idiocy. If only I’d opted for lying instead.

That’s chilling and insane but, disturbingly, makes some sense.

Why Chernobyl? How utterly bizarre.

They won’t be returning any of the money though will they?

I know it’s more nuanced than this but it seems the world is just going to watch as troops stroll into Kiev and effectively take control of another country unopposed.