Search results

I have read what numerous aviation experts have said over the last three and a half years. I have read a detailed summary from the prosecution and I have read the defence statement which claims ' cognitive impairment ' and a pilot lacking any memory. The evidence of the defence suggests that...

Cognitive impairment? I take this to mean unable to function properly due to excessive G Forces within the aircraft. I am no expert but assume these were caused by the manner in which he was flying the aircraft. Please tell me that I have missed something here.

Having heard all the evidence from aviation experts, I have to say that that is a surprising decision. I would imagine that the many bereaved will be more than disappointed.