Physical, forensic? None. But there is a vat of testamony and circumstantial evidence (e.g., child 'stays' over, Savile boasts to some peopel he did things, later and independently child, now adult steps forward). Countless examples. I grant you all of these people could have colluded and made...
Silly comment. Who are you going to drag into this 'debate' next as an example of someone 'obviously guilty' to make your point? Charlie Manson? Hitler?